写作与性别

June 3, 2011 on 1:13 am | In 文坛书讯 | 5 Comments

01,V.S. Naipaul 最近又大放厥词,说没有一位女作家可以与他比肩。看到这种无谓的偏见,只想一笑了之。不过Naipaul在采访中说,他看书只要读上一两段就知道作者是女是男,针对此,《卫报》设计了一个小测验,能分辨出这些段落的作者的性别吗?

新闻链接:http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jun/02/vs-naipaul-jane-austen-women-writers

测试链接:http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/quiz/2011/jun/02/naipaul-test-author-s-sex-quiz

02,《纽约书评》上一篇关于山西大同重建古城的文章,China’s Glorious New Past(中国辉煌的新过去)

链接:http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/jun/01/chinas-glorious-new-past/

03,一本关于劫掠和追索艺术品的书,Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities at the World’s Richest Museum, by Jason Felch and Ralph Frammolino

书评链接:http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jun/23/what-went-wrong-getty/

5 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. 嘿嘿,只读第一句……成绩是7分

    Comment by mango — June 3, 2011 2:09 am UTC #

  2. 最近正好在读a house for mr.biswas!这么说这个作者蛮自负的嘛,要好好了解了解~~

    Comment by ziye — June 5, 2011 7:57 am UTC #

  3. 我觉得Michael Cunningham一个男作家撰文谈Virginia Woolf倒和V.S. Naipaul形成有趣的对比。

    Comment by lmzslh — June 6, 2011 5:09 am UTC #

  4. 对了8个。有一定的道理,但是太绝对了。感性不一定是坏事,理性也不一定是好事。

    Comment by T.J.安 — June 7, 2011 10:38 pm UTC #

  5. 8分,我还是挺喜欢奈保尔的

    Comment by vookeno — June 12, 2011 7:28 pm UTC #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with theme based on Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^