写作与性别
June 3, 2011 on 1:13 am | In 文坛书讯 | 5 Comments01，V.S. Naipaul 最近又大放厥词，说没有一位女作家可以与他比肩。看到这种无谓的偏见，只想一笑了之。不过Naipaul在采访中说，他看书只要读上一两段就知道作者是女是男，针对此，《卫报》设计了一个小测验，能分辨出这些段落的作者的性别吗？
新闻链接：http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jun/02/vs-naipaul-jane-austen-women-writers
测试链接：http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/quiz/2011/jun/02/naipaul-test-author-s-sex-quiz
02，《纽约书评》上一篇关于山西大同重建古城的文章，China’s Glorious New Past（中国辉煌的新过去）
链接：http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/jun/01/chinas-glorious-new-past/
03，一本关于劫掠和追索艺术品的书，Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities at the World’s Richest Museum, by Jason Felch and Ralph Frammolino
书评链接：http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jun/23/what-went-wrong-getty/
5 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with theme based on Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
嘿嘿，只读第一句……成绩是7分
Comment by mango — June 3, 2011 2:09 am GMT-0700 #
最近正好在读a house for mr.biswas!这么说这个作者蛮自负的嘛，要好好了解了解~~
Comment by ziye — June 5, 2011 7:57 am GMT-0700 #
我觉得Michael Cunningham一个男作家撰文谈Virginia Woolf倒和V.S. Naipaul形成有趣的对比。
Comment by lmzslh — June 6, 2011 5:09 am GMT-0700 #
对了8个。有一定的道理，但是太绝对了。感性不一定是坏事，理性也不一定是好事。
Comment by T.J.安 — June 7, 2011 10:38 pm GMT-0700 #
8分，我还是挺喜欢奈保尔的
Comment by vookeno — June 12, 2011 7:28 pm GMT-0700 #